Client-Side JavaScript

James Fenn |

link Website

My main project today has been rewriting most of my personal site in Jekyll and making a script using the GitHub API to update the relevant collections & push to git instead of making the site use the API to fetch data in client-side js like it was before.


Why was I using the GitHub API client-side?

I have a lot of projects. I wanted to have a portfolio site, but writing the entire thing myself and manually updating it each time I started a new one would have been a nightmare. Since I was (and still am) using GitHub pages, I obviously couldn't have it fetch this information on the server, so the only obvious choice was to do it on the client instead.

Why was this bad?

Here are a few reasons.

Crappy Hackery

So, I rewrote my site to use Jekyll and do away with all of the client-side JavaScript. Up until this point I'd added test files to all of the collections ("/_types" for types of projects, and "/_projects" for the actual projects) while I was writing my fancy liquid extensions.

The plan was that I was going to make a script to get repository info and create the files in "/_projects". I decided that since the GitHub API uses JSON, it would be easiest to write the data-fetching script in NodeJS. While I was at it, I'd also write a basic shell script for the purpose of deleting all the previous files, running the NodeJS script to create new ones, and pushing the result to GitHub all in one command. This ended up being a little more complicated, though, as you will soon find out.

To organize the projects into sections as you see on the projects page, I was planning on adding what GitHub calls "topics" to each of my repositories that would be defined in the "/_types" collection, along with the type names and order. The API endpoint to fetch a repo's types was in beta, but all it would need to work is an extra header. I'd then add a "type" attribute to each of the "/_projects" and have Jekyll use that to decide which section it belongs in. However, when I was writing the script, I discovered a flaw in this plan: if I have an array of multiple topics for a repository, how do I know which one should be set as the "type" attribute? I could hardcode an array of the possible types in the script, but that would be a pain if I wanted to change them later. I could scan through each file in the /_topics folder and attempt to parse its front matter, but that could break easily. Or...

I could add a front matter to the .js file and run Jekyll locally to create a hardcoded array for me before running the script.

With a little help from Heinrich Reimer to get the commas to go in the right places (as well as some rubber duck debugging when I had apparently forgotten how to assign a value to a variable), I was able to get this to work pretty nicely. However, this made things a little confusing for the shell script I was planning to make. Instead of just running the js script, I would have to run "jekyll serve" in a separate process, locate the script in the output files, reinstall its dependencies (they refused to behave otherwise, and would throw errors), THEN run the script, and finally kill the jekyll process so that I don't have an endless instance of Jekyll running on my laptop until I reboot. After all that, my once simple 3-line shell script ended up being a little closer to this.

Aaaaaand that's what I did today. I've finished messing around with it. The changes are live now. I won't steal your unauthenticated requests anymore. Bye.